What are the political causes of corruption?
Main causes for corruption are according to the studies (1) the size and structure of governments, (2) the democracy and the political system, (3) the quality of institutions, (4) economic freedom/openness of economy, (5) salaries of civil service, (6) press freedom and judiciary, (7) cultural determinants, (8) …
How can we solve poverty in the Philippines?
Greater Access to Education: A factor of systemic poverty is a lack of access to education in impoverished areas. People gain basic skills and increased job opportunities through education, which can help to combat poverty in the Philippines.

What is RA 7080 all about?
Republic Act No. 7080 defines the crime of plunder as the accumulation of iII- gotten wealth through a combination or series of overt criminal acts in the aggregate amount of 1’50,000,000.00 by a public official.
What is the importance of RA No 7080?
What is graft and corruption in the government?
Graft, as understood in American English, is a form of political corruption defined as the unscrupulous use of a politician’s authority for personal gain. Political graft occurs when funds intended for public projects are intentionally misdirected in order to maximize the benefits to private interests.

What is quid pro quo (QPQ)?
First, just to define terms, quid pro quo (QPQ) corruption is the exchange of “this for that,” done with a corrupt intent, or in short: bribery. According to the current doctrine about the law of bribery, and common sense, quid pro quo agreements can exist, even without an explicitly-stated agreement between the parties.
Are lobbyists really quid pro quo corrupt?
They argue in a mixed-methods design—drawing on both qualitative data and formal analysis—that much of what lobbyists do isn’t really quid pro quo corruption, notwithstanding the appearances. A couple of thoughts to extend the conversation:
Are Quids and Quos proportions proportional in bribes?
More systematically, scholars have studied empirically whether quids and quos are typically proportional in bribery cases, and found that a 14:1 ratio is typical in the U.S. Thus, the major premise of the disproportionality thesis seems false: paradigmatic bribes are not necessarily proportional.
Can a quid pro quo agreement exist without an agreement?
According to the current doctrine about the law of bribery, and common sense, quid pro quo agreements can exist, even without an explicitly-stated agreement between the parties.